If Kamala Harris is elected, we can continue to pressure her to end the war on Gaza. The other option for president, Donald Trump, is a threat to our right to protest.
(Bennett Raglin / WireImage)
Fifty-seven years ago, my father issued a prophetic denunciation of the war in Vietnam. His speech at the Riverside Church in New York City, delivered one year to the day before he was assassinated, ruptured his relationship with the Lyndon Baines Johnson administration and received criticism from other civil rights leaders.
“Now, it should be incandescently clear that no one who has any concern for the integrity and life of America today can ignore the present war,” he said. “If America’s soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read: Vietnam. It can never be saved so long as it destroys the deepest hopes of men the world over. So it is that those of us who are yet determined that America will be—are—are led down the path of protest and dissent, working for the health of our land.”
Today, I join in protest and dissent from war by opposing Benjamin Netanyahu’s amoral actions toward the Palestinian people, while also mourning the loss of Israeli, Jewish, and Palestinian lives. The devastation and death must end. I plead with the Biden administration to do everything in our power to end this war. We must embrace what my father called in his speech against the war in Vietnam “a genuine revolution of values,” meaning that our final analysis must be ecumenical rather than sectional. We need a vision and a plan for peace and security for both Israelis and Palestinians.
I’m grateful for those—especially young Americans—who protest nonviolently in the tradition of my father for true peace, which encompasses justice and a humane pathway forward. As we continue to protest, we must ask ourselves which of the two candidates for president will listen to our protests.
The gains we made during the civil rights movement would not have been obtainable in the absence of our democracy and our Constitution, and those two are being threatened this election. The right to protest, as one of the fundamental tenets of our Constitution, is what gave my father and those who worked with him the power to challenge and change de jure (by law) segregation in this nation.
Change will not happen without the power and force of the people through nonviolent social change. What is happening in Gaza under the hawkish leadership of Netanyahu should and must be protested and nonviolently resisted. To ensure that that right is preserved so that we can continue to pressure our government to stand on the side of right, we will need presidential leadership that will listen to our protests and heed our demands and not seek to criminalize our constitutional right to protest.
Current Issue
I believe that Kamala Harris is listening and that we can continue to pressure her to use all levers of American influence on the Netanyahu government to end the war. The other option for president, Donald Trump, is an immediate and persistent threat to our right to protest.
Donald Trump has spoken of turning the US military against domestic enemies. Donald Trump has in no way expressed concern for the humanity of Palestinian people.
The path to peace in the Middle East does not run through Donald Trump in the White House again. One reason we can be sure of that is that Project 2025 makes it clear that a second Trump administration would be more authoritarian than the first. The Supreme Court has given him a green light for that in the recent presidential immunity case.
A second Trump administration would weaponize the Justice Department to punish any dissent. My father experienced the weaponization of the Justice Department personally, having the FBI monitor him and attempt to discredit him. The long march to make the promise of democracy more real for all Americans will take a sharp turn backward if Donald Trump is elected president again. We cannot go back. And we certainly cannot afford to go forward with an administration that does not respect and value a government of, for, and by the people.
Vice President Kamala Harris will provide us the opportunity to preserve our democracy and rule of law as we continue the people’s fight to create a just, humane, and equitable society. She has the commitment, experience, intelligence, and energy to lead at this critical moment for our country and world.
I understand and share the deep sorrow many Americans feel about the Biden administration’s continued support for the war in Gaza. A vote for Kamala Harris is not an endorsement of US funding for the war. Voting for Kamala Harris does not mean you are forsaking your right to protest her actions and policies. Yet we stand to lose the right to protest in a second Trump administration. My mother, Mrs. Coretta Scott King, said “Struggle is a never ending process. Freedom is never really won, you earn it and win it in every generation.” I believe we can struggle for, and win, freedom and peace with justice in a Harris administration.
Our greatness as a nation lies in this constitutional right, just as my father said in his last public speech on April 3, 1968, in Memphis, Tennessee: “The greatness of America is the right to protest for right.” If we truly want to continue to move this nation forward for all people and ensure the greatness of America, then voting for Kamala Harris is a vote to protect justice, freedom, and democracy. And while doing so, in the words of my father, let us “rededicate ourselves to the long and bitter, but beautiful, struggle for a new world.”
Can we count on you?
In the coming election, the fate of our democracy and fundamental civil rights are on the ballot. The conservative architects of Project 2025 are scheming to institutionalize Donald Trump’s authoritarian vision across all levels of government if he should win.
We’ve already seen events that fill us with both dread and cautious optimism—throughout it all, The Nation has been a bulwark against misinformation and an advocate for bold, principled perspectives. Our dedicated writers have sat down with Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders for interviews, unpacked the shallow right-wing populist appeals of J.D. Vance, and debated the pathway for a Democratic victory in November.
Stories like these and the one you just read are vital at this critical juncture in our country’s history. Now more than ever, we need clear-eyed and deeply reported independent journalism to make sense of the headlines and sort fact from fiction. Donate today and join our 160-year legacy of speaking truth to power and uplifting the voices of grassroots advocates.
Throughout 2024 and what is likely the defining election of our lifetimes, we need your support to continue publishing the insightful journalism you rely on.
Thank you,
The Editors of The Nation
More from The Nation
In Colorado, Kentucky, and Nebraska, referendums on “school choice” are on the ballot in the 2024 election.
What the newspaper’s editorial-page editor really meant was, “My corporate paymasters want to wallow in Donald Trump’s tax cuts.”
Musk and his PAC are effectively paying people in swing states to register to vote, and that is a clear violation of federal law.
The UAW’s Shawn Fain says a focus on the harm done to workers by Trump’s trade policies can help form a powerful closing message for the Democrats.
Finally, the warnings are coming loud and fast. Will they matter this late in the day?
