Trans People Shouldn’t Be Scapegoated for Democrats’ Failures

Spread the love

November 20, 2024

Politicians and pundits are stoking a backlash to trans rights in the wake of the election. They’re playing a dangerous game.

Vice President Kamala Harris speaks onstage during a Pride celebration on June 28, 2023 in Washington, DC. — Vice President Kamala Harris speaks onstage during a Pride celebration on June 28, 2023, in Washington, DC.

(Tasos Katopodis / Getty Images for GLAAD)

Donald Trump’s election victory foreshadows an administration that will likely seek to not just dismantle but destroy the regulatory state while promoting a narrow vision of what America should be and who should benefit from living here.

But as election results continue to trickle in, it has also become clear that the governing majority needed to achieve these goals may not be as robust as it was projected on election night. Trump failed to win 50 percent of the popular vote, and the GOP’s House and Senate majorities are both razor-thin.

Yet instead of thinking about how this unexpectedly small mandate on how this could be used for their advantage, a subset of Democrats have decided to spend their time saying that the true reason for the 2024 election loss lies with some of their coalition’s most vulnerable members: transgender Americans and the allies that seek to protect their civil rights.

Almost immediately after Trump’s victory, a number of Democratic politicians, as well as major advisers in the party’s inner and outer circles, rushed to the airwaves and their social media accounts to say the party had lost touch with the average American by catering to the fringes of the party. Their statements all seemed to feature two main points: first, that the “far left” had captured the Democratic machinery’s stance on social issues, leading to alienation from voters, and second, that Democrats need to distance themselves from support for trans kids who want to play on sports teams that match their gender identity.

One representative, Seth Moulton of Massachusetts’s Sixth District told The New York Times, “I have two little girls, I don’t want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat I’m supposed to be afraid to say that.”

In Texas, former party leader Gilbert Hinojosa said that ultimately Democrats “have a choice as a party,” in what kind of issues to champion and which kind of issues to compromise on.

Current Issue

“You could, for example, you can support transgender rights up and down all the categories where the issue comes up, or you can understand that there’s certain things that we just go too far on, that a big bulk of our population does not support,” he added. (He later apologized before resigning his post altogether in the wake of the party’s decisive loss in the state.)

These points have been reinforced by other pundits such as Pamela Paul, the preeminent “transgender rights conversations have gone too far” whisperer at the Times, who wrote an OpEd this week saying the Democratic Party needs to adopt “common sense” approaches to transgender rights. The message from all of these figures was the same: pushing for equal civil and human rights must not make those who might face discomfort from what that entails pay any cost.

As much as these powerful political insiders and commentators would like to scapegoat children who just want to play soccer on the team that feels right for them, the evidence to suggest that trans rights were a decisive factor in the election is slim. Exit polls following the election have shown that the state of the economy, an overall desire for change at all costs, and party drift in certain demographics to the right were the main reasons propelling Trump to an electoral victory, not social issues. Even a plurality of those who believe abortion should be legal in most cases —a cause célèbre for the Democratic coalition—voted for Trump. What’s more, voters in Delaware elected the first openly trans congressperson in history, Democrat Sarah McBride. (Republicans immediately launched transphobic attacks on McBride, including trying to bar her from using the women’s restroom.)

Yet despite all of this, politicians looking to score a cheap hit on a vulnerable group are happy to use trans Americans as an example because the party knows the community does not have much of an alternative electorally.

“They are the only real political avenue who are willing to represent us and defend us, but at the same time we aren’t being listened to,” Brey, a trans voter in Connecticut, told The Nation following a week of comments by party members singling out her community. This kind of punching down serves nobody except the reactionary forces trying to erase trans people from the landscape altogether.

Perhaps one reason trans rights became perceived as a troubling issue for Democrats is because they seemed so uncomfortable defending them. For instance, Kamala Harris gave evasive, vague answers when asked about her support for gender-affirming care, sending voters a message that she had something to hide and raising the political salience of the issue. Contrast that approach to that of Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, who loudly stood up for trans people in a very red state and won re-election convincingly in 2023.

“There are so many ways in which during the election the Democrats could have turned Republican rhetoric against them,” Brey added.

Republicans are continually trying to ban transgender minors from accessing healthcare. Democrats, including politicians such as Moulton, have backed legislation such as the Transgender Bill of Rights and the Equality Act, which would enshrine federal civil rights protections for transgender Americans into law. However, whenever Democrats face adversity, some members of the party coalition seem immediately prepared to compromise on these civil rights promises in search of hypothetical bipartisanship.

As we’ve seen, this kind of triangulation does not yield electoral success. And it only serves to weaken support for the transgender community at a time when the party planning to take power next January has broader goals of subjugation in mind.

“What’s not helpful right now are random hot takes based on nothing and the scapegoating of people who’ve long been in MAGA’s crosshairs,” Brandon Wolf, national press secretary for the Human Rights Campaign, an LGBTQ rights advocacy group, told The Nation. “There’s no denying that Democrats lost on Tuesday, and everyone needs to do some introspection and learning based on meaningful conversations with people across the political divide and hard data. We have work to do. But that work is about being more welcoming, not less, and reaching more people with real solutions to actual problems.”

It’s unclear how the party will address this emerging fissure going forward, as Trump tries to ram through a cavalcade of cabinet appointees, taking up the immediate attention of a party that still controls the White House and Senate for the next two months.

Moulton says the uproar his comments caused just shows how he was correct to bring up the issue in the first place. “We’ve got to be able to have these debates,” he added. But thankfully, we can also point to some of his other words, which Democrats everywhere should heed: “We did not lose the 2024 election because of any trans person or issue.”

We cannot back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation